Mark Greif recently published an essay in the Chronicle of Higher Education that considered the importance of Partisan Review in American intellectual life (http://chronicle.com/article/Whats-Wrong-With-Public/189921/). What Greif identified as important about PR, its intellectual cultural contribution, many listeners of the Christian Humanist network of podcasts desire to experience in our own historical moment. This is why we listen.
As a sometimes-contributor to The Christian Humanist Podcast, I’ve found great satisfaction and excitement in engaging with my co-hosts and listeners in conversation about the life of the mind in all its complexity and variousness. So when Farmer, Grubbs, and Gilmour offered me the chance to begin my own podcast, I was honored, and would now like to take them up on their kind offer. I had initially intended to begin this project last year, but unforeseen circumstances drew my time and attention and I had to hold off (long story short, I will be starting a new job as Assistant Professor of English at Mount Aloysius College this Fall). Now seems the time to begin this project.
I have no interest in hosting, as Michial puts it, The Danny Show. My own intellectual inspiration largely springs from New York Intellectuals like Lionel Trilling, who was a central figure in the Partisan Review crowd, and he worked within that larger, vibrant intellectual community. So the idea I have is to imagine Partisan Review in the CHP network. Nathan Gilmour suggested the name Sectarian Review, and this is what I’ve gone with.
The idea is to have a large pool of scholars from a variety of disciplines contribute regularly or semi-regularly and to aim for an episode once a month (at least at first). Topics are solicited, and might include subjects such as: the role of the artist in society, Disney and Culture, The Christian Imagination, political commitment in the age of Twitter, etc… In short, whatever strikes the contributors as worthy of discussion.
In the tradition of PR, I welcome contributors from across disciplines. Economists, rhetoricians, sociologists, historians, philosophers, literary scholars, mathematicians, musicologists, and gender studies, as well as professionals from law, clergy, and medicine would bring a diversity of intellectual perspectives that would, I believe, prove to be an enlightening hour of conversation. (I’m sure I left disciplines out of the above list, so please forgive me and take it as a sign of my openness to a variety of perspectives).
If you are interested in participating, please feel invited to contact me at email@example.com
I look forward to developing something great with you.
One thought on “The Sectarian Review: An Invitation”
[…] The Sectarian Review is hosted by Danny Anderson, a 2012 Ph.D. graduate of Case Western Reserve University and now an Assistant Professor of English at Mount Aloysius College. The second episode’s release announcement states, “In the latest episode of Sectarian Review, Danny Anderson chats with Mark Trump and Thom Dawkins about ‘Voice in the Age of Mansplaining.’ This month’s Sectarians talk a little politics, a little poetry, a little theology, and a little punk music. Also in this episode is an interview Danny conducted with Kierstin Muroski, Director of Mount Aloysius College’s American Sign Language Interpreting program, in which we learn about how an abstract concept like voice manifests in the deaf community and deaf culture.” […]